EU Commission Clarifies Revamped Copyright Rules Amid Criticism

A key provision, Article 17, would force YouTube, Instagram, other sharing platforms to install filters to prevent uploading of copyrighted materials.

By Reuters | Updated: 4 June 2021 17:36 IST

The platforms can be sued for making copyright-infringing content available to the public

Highlights

Critics say filters are costly and could lead to erroneous blocking
EU countries have until June 7 to transpose directive into national law
Article 17 should not apply to caricature, parody, criticism, review

The European Commission on Friday sought to clarify the scope and liability of revised copyright rules adopted last year in an effort to defuse criticism from France, Poland, EU broadcasters, and Internet activists.

The revamped copyright directive, the first overhaul in two decades, aimed to provide fair compensation for the bloc's $1 trillion (roughly Rs. 73,00,090 crores) creative industry and its 11.7 million employees.

It triggered a fierce lobbying battle, pitting artists and news publishers against tech companies, Internet activists and consumer groups, with France also joining the fray while Poland took its grievance to a court.

Facebook Marketplace in EU, UK Antitrust Crosshairs

A key provision, Article 17, backed by the creative industry, would force Google-owned YouTube, Facebook's Instagram, and other sharing platforms to install filters to prevent users from uploading copyrighted materials.

The platforms can be sued for making copyright-infringing content available to the public, even where it has been uploaded by their users. Critics however say filters are costly and could lead to erroneous blocking.

EU countries have until June 7 to transpose the directive into national law.

The Commission in its policy paper published on Friday said Article 17 would only apply to online service providers and online audio and video streaming service providers which make money from copyrighted work uploaded to their platforms by their users.

Not-for-profit online encyclopaedias and educational bodies, open source software platforms, and online marketplaces would be exempt from the rule.

Companies may escape liability if they can show that they have made their best efforts to obtain authorisation for copyrighted works on their platforms and acted speedily to remove content when notified.

To mollify Internet activists, the Commission said Article 17 should not apply to caricature, parody, criticism, review, and quotation.

It said automated blocking of content should only be limited to manifestly infringing uploads and that EU countries should provide a complaint and redress mechanism to service providers so that their users can use it in the event of disputes.

It's an all television spectacular this week on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast, as we discuss 8K, screen sizes, QLED and mini-LED panels — and offer some buying advice. Orbital is available on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.

Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details.

Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.