Researchers Question Authenticity of Mosasaur Fossil in Morocco Mine

A newly discovered mosasaur fossil raises doubts over its authenticity, prompting calls for CT scans

Advertisement
Written by Gadgets 360 Staff | Updated: 15 January 2025 13:07 IST
Highlights
  • Mosasaur fossil may be a forgery, researchers claim
  • CT scans needed to verify authenticity of the fossil
  • Fossil from Morocco raises concerns over scientific integrity

The discovery of a mosasaur fossil

Photo Credit: NASA

Concerns have been raised over the authenticity of a fossil used to describe a mosasaur species that reportedly existed 72 to 66 million years ago. The fossil, discovered in a phosphate mine in Morocco, formed the basis for the classification of Xenodens calminechari, a marine predator with unique saw-like teeth. The 2021 study that introduced this species is now being questioned by researchers, citing inconsistencies in the fossil's structure and provenance.

Questions Raised About Fossil Authenticity

According to the study published in The Anatomical Record, anomalies in the jawbone and teeth have cast doubt on whether the fossil is genuine. Two teeth were observed sharing a single tooth socket, a feature that contradicts the biology of mosasaurs, which typically have one tooth per socket. Dr. Michael Caldwell, a professor of biological sciences at the University of Alberta, noted that mosasaurs continuously replaced their teeth, leaving individual sockets formed by the surrounding bone. He explained this discrepancy to Live Science, emphasising that the overlap of material around the teeth also suggests potential tampering.

Fossil Provenance Under Scrutiny

The fossil was unearthed in a region known for fossils with forged elements, according to the study. Researchers have advocated for computed tomography (CT) scans to verify its authenticity. However, access to the fossil, held by Nick Longrich, a paleontologist at the University of Bath and lead author of the original study, has proven challenging. Henry Sharpe, the lead author of the latest paper, stated to Live Science that withholding information about a holotype specimen is unethical, as such specimens must be accessible for scientific scrutiny.

Advertisement

Calls for further investigation are growing, with researchers emphasizing the importance of verifying the fossil's authenticity to preserve the integrity of scientific records.

Advertisement

 

 

Catch the latest from the Consumer Electronics Show on Gadgets 360, at our CES 2026 hub.

Advertisement

Related Stories

Popular Mobile Brands
  1. CNAP vs Truecaller: Which Is Better at Identifying Spam Calls?
  2. Samsung Galaxy S26 Series Roundup: Everything That We Know So Far
  3. Mask OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch This Action-Packed Thriller Online?
  1. Quantum Haloscope Sharpens the Search for Dark Matter Axions at Higher Frequencies
  2. Rare Interstellar Object 3I/ATLAS Fails Alien Test, Scientists Say
  3. CNAP vs Truecaller: How India’s Official Caller ID System Differs From the Popular App
  4. Prayagraj Ki Love Story Set to Stream Soon on Hungama OTT
  5. Mask OTT Release Date: When and Where to Watch This Action-Packed Thriller Online?
  6. New Year 2026 Custom Greetings: 5 Best AI Prompts for ChatGPT, Gemini, and Other AI Tools
  7. NASA’s Chandra Spots Champagne Cluster Formed by a Massive Galaxy Collision
  8. NASA’s Curiosity Rover Sends Stunning Sunrise-and-Sunset Holiday Postcard from Mars
  9. Oppo Find X9s Key Specifications Leaked Again; Might Also Launch in India
  10. Redmi Turbo 5, Redmi Turbo 5 Pro to Be Equipped With Upcoming MediaTek Dimensity Chips, Tipster Claims
Gadgets 360 is available in
Download Our Apps
Available in Hindi
© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2026. All rights reserved.