Home
Others
Others News
Samsung says chairman has no link 'whatsoever' to Indian court case

Samsung says chairman has no link 'whatsoever' to Indian court case

By Agence France-Presse | Updated: 3 April 2014 12:47 IST

South Korea's Samsung Electronics said Thursday its chairman Lee Kun-Hee had no link "whatsoever" to a case that has led India's Supreme Court to demand his appearance at a trial hearing.

The court ruled this week that Lee, South Korea's richest man with an estimated net worth of $11.2 billion, should appear before the trial court in Ghaziabad, on the outskirts of New Delhi, in the next six weeks.

Dating back to 2002, the case stems from a complaint by New Delhi-based JCE Consultancy accusing Samsung Electronics of "cheating" the Indian company out of $1.4 million by failing to honour a commitment to pay a bill.

"Chairman Lee has no relation to this case whatsoever," Samsung said in a statement.

"There are no grounds, let alone evidence, to support the accusation against chairman Lee," it said, adding that he was not involved in the day-to-day operations of Samsung's many overseas subsidiaries.

The statement declined to address the Indian Supreme Court's order for the 72-year-old to appear in person, and a Samsung spokesman declined to comment further on the matter.

(Also see: Samsung Chairman Lee Kun-hee ordered to appear before Ghaziabad court)

Samsung said the case was related to a "multi-million dollar fraud scheme" perpetrated against a Samsung subsidiary in Dubai, Samsung Gulf Electronics.

"Samsung Gulf Electronics is a victim of this fraud scheme," it said.

"We are confident that the Indian Courts will recognise the innocence of Chairman Lee and deliver justice," it added.

Lee's lawyers had tried unsuccessfully to have the case thrown out of court in India.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court made no comment on the merits of the case, saying that was up to the trial court to decide.

Indian courts have a track record of summoning top executives who, despite having no direct involvement in alleged offences by their companies, are deemed to be potentially responsible because of their seniority in the firm.

Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.