• Home
  • Mobiles
  • Mobiles News
  • Samsung Ordered to Pay Fine of $9.8 Million Within 30 Days for Misleading Australian Phone Ads

Samsung Ordered to Pay Fine of $9.8 Million Within 30 Days for Misleading Australian Phone Ads

Samsung admitted to making false claims in nine advertisements between 2016 and 2018 about the water resistance of seven Galaxy models.

Samsung Ordered to Pay Fine of $9.8 Million Within 30 Days for Misleading Australian Phone Ads

Photo Credit: Samsung

Samsung admitted to making false and misleading claims in advertisements between 2016 and 2018

Highlights
  • Samsung is given 30 days to pay the fines
  • Samsung admitted to making misleading claims in nine advertisements
  • The misleading ads promoted the phones' water resistance

An Australian judge on Thursday ordered Samsung to pay AUD 14 million (roughly Rs. 78 crore) in penalties for misleading advertising over how water-resistant some models of smartphones are.

Federal Court Justice Brendan Murphy gave Samsung Electronics Australia, a subsidiary of South Korea-based Samsung Electronics, 30 days to pay the fines.

Samsung must also pay AUD 200,000 (roughly Rs. 1 crore) toward the costs of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, the consumer watchdog that initiated an investigation of the phones four years ago.

Samsung admitted to making false and misleading claims in nine advertisements between 2016 and 2018 about the water resistance of seven models of Galaxy smartphones. They are the Galaxy S7, Galaxy S7 Edge, Galaxy A5 (2017), Galaxy A7 (2017), Galaxy S8, Galaxy S8 Plus and Galaxy Note 8.

Samsung and the commission also agreed to the penalties imposed.

The misleading ads promoted the phones' water resistance and suitability for use in swimming pools and seawater. But the charging ports could be damaged and stop working if the phones were recharged while the ports were still wet.

Samsung said the charging port issue only effected the seven models identified in the case that were launched between 2016 and 2017.

“The issue does not arise for Samsung's current phones,” a Samsung statement said.

Samsung sold 3.1 million of the vulnerable phones in Australia, but the court could not determine how many customers found faults in their charging ports.

An unknown number of customers had their ports replaced by authorized Samsung repairers. Some repairers did the job for free while others charged between AUD 180 (roughly Rs. 10,000) and AUD 245 (roughly Rs. 13,600), the court heard.

Murphy said customers were entitled to assume that a large company such as Samsung would not advertise that its Galaxy phones could safely be submerged in water if they could not.

“A great many consumers are likely to have seen the offending advertisements and a significant number of those who did so are likely to have purchased one of the Galaxy phones,” Murphy said in his judgment.

Commission Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said her investigation had received hundreds of complaints from phone owners.

“They experienced issues with their Galaxy phones after it was exposed to water and, in may cases, they reported their Galaxy phones stopped working entirely,” Cass-Gottlieb said in a statement.

The judge said the penalty exceeded Samsung's profit during the course of the misleading advertising campaign.

Samsung's lawyers had initially denied the ads were misleading and that the phones could be damaged by immersion in water, the judge said.

“I do not consider Samsung Australia should be given much credit for its cooperation,” Murphy said.

Samsung said it had cooperated with the commission's investigations, which originally included more than 600 ads and 15 Galaxy phone models.

“Samsung endeavours to deliver the best possible experience to all our customers and we regret that a small number of our Galaxy users experienced an issue with their device pertaining to this matter,” Samsung said.


Do Samsung's Galaxy S22 and Tab S8 series have any Android competition? We discuss this on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Spotify, Gaana, JioSaavn, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.
  • REVIEW
  • KEY SPECS
  • NEWS
  • Variants
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Looks absolutely stunning
  • Record-breaking power
  • Incredible camera
  • IP68 protection
  • Bad
  • Slightly unweildy
  • Hybrid SIM/microSD slot
  • Bloated software
Display 5.50-inch
Processor octa-core
Front Camera 5-megapixel
Rear Camera 12-megapixel
RAM 4GB
Storage 32GB
Battery Capacity 3600mAh
OS Android 6.0
Resolution 1440x2560 pixels
  • REVIEW
  • KEY SPECS
  • NEWS
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Ergonomic size, good build
  • IP86 rating
  • Samsung Pay support
  • Functional UI
  • Bad
  • Autofocus is slow, struggles in macros
  • Weak speaker for media playback
Display 5.20-inch
Processor Samsung Exynos 7880
Front Camera 16-megapixel
Rear Camera 16-megapixel
RAM 3GB
Storage 32GB
Battery Capacity 3000mAh
OS Android 6.0
Resolution 1080x1920 pixels
  • REVIEW
  • KEY SPECS
  • NEWS
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Excellent buildquality, design and display
  • Useful stylus
  • Very good cameras
  • Speedy performance
  • Bad
  • Slightly heavy
  • Battery life could be better
Display 6.30-inch
Processor Samsung Exynos 8895
Front Camera 8-megapixel
Rear Camera 12-megapixel + 12-megapixel
RAM 6GB
Storage 64GB
Battery Capacity 3300mAh
OS Android 7.1.1
Resolution 1440x2960 pixels
  • REVIEW
  • KEY SPECS
  • NEWS
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • IP68 rated
  • Very good build
  • Samsung Pay support
  • Functional UI
  • Bad
  • Heavy and bulky
  • Autofocus is slow, struggles in macros
  • Questionable value for money
Display 5.70-inch
Processor Samsung Exynos 7880
Front Camera 16-megapixel
Rear Camera 16-megapixel
RAM 3GB
Storage 32GB
Battery Capacity 3600mAh
OS Android 6.0
Resolution 1080x1920 pixels
  • REVIEW
  • KEY SPECS
  • NEWS
  • Design
  • Display
  • Software
  • Performance
  • Battery Life
  • Camera
  • Value for Money
  • Good
  • Gorgeous looks and excellent construction quality
  • Brilliant displays
  • Phenomenal camera quality
  • Class-leading performance
  • Bad
  • No flat screen option
  • Nearly unusable fingerprint reader
  • Software stuffed with unnecessary features
Display 5.80-inch
Processor Samsung Exynos 8895
Front Camera 8-megapixel
Rear Camera 12-megapixel
RAM 4GB
Storage 64GB
Battery Capacity 3000mAh
OS Android 7.0
Resolution 1440x2960 pixels
Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on Twitter, Facebook, and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

HUAWEI Mate Xs 2 Outshines Its Competition and Stands Out as the Ideal Foldable Phone: Ultra Light, Ultra Flat, Super Durable
Facebook, Twitter, Telegram Urged to Fight Russian Disinformation in a Better Way
Share on Facebook Tweet Snapchat Share Reddit Comment
 
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

© Copyright Red Pixels Ventures Limited 2022. All rights reserved.