Many of today's smartphones share similar features, from responsive
touchscreens that let users unlock the phone with a flick of a finger,
to pop-up animations that offer a shortcut to dialing a number or
storing it in a digital address book.
Those similarities are at
the center of an array of patent disputes as Apple and Samsung
Electronics sue each other in courts and trade offices around the world.
The
companies' most recent legal fight all but concluded on Friday, when a
California jury found that Samsung copied some of Apple's smartphone
features. The panel also concluded that Apple illegally used one of
Samsung's patents in creating the iPhone 4 and 5.
All told, the jury awarded Samsung $158,400 and Apple $119 million, far less than the $2.2 billion the company sought.
Jurors
were ordered to return to court Monday to continue deliberations on a
minor matter that could result in a higher award for Apple.
Before
determining whether the companies copied phone technologies, jurors had
to consider several patents. Here's a look at select patents and the
jury's conclusions:
Patent 5,946,647
Official description: System and method for performing an action on a structure in computer-generated data.
What
it really means: In a mobile device, the technology described in this
patent is used to display a pop-up menu of options. One example: When
you highlight a phone number on the touchscreen and the software gives
you a prompt of options.
The jury's verdict: The jury found that
Apple proved Samsung infringed on the patent across several mobile
devices, including the Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy S III (Review|Pictures) and Stratosphere.
Patent 6,847,959
Official description: Universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system.
What
it really means: This patent covers a process that's similar to the
function of a search engine. It enables the mobile device to access
information from a variety of locations, while only listing relevant
data for the user.
One of the features in the patent is a graphic interface showing a "Go-To" menu option in a text input window.
The jury's verdict: Apple failed to prove Samsung infringed on this patent.
Patent 7,761,414
Official description: Asynchronous data synchronization among devices.
What
it really means: This patent involves a way to synchronize data across
computers and mobile devices. In the case of a smartphone, this could
apply to synchronizing address books on your phone with online storage.
The jury's verdict: Samsung did not infringe on Apple's patent.
Patent 8,046,721
Official description: Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image.
What
it really means: This patent refers to a way of controlling an
electronic device with a touch-sensitive display. Specifically, Apple
claimed Samsung infringed on a feature of the patent that describes the
swipe-and-unlock feature on iPhones.
The jury's verdict: Apple
made its case that certain Samsung devices, including the Admire,
Stratosphere and Galaxy Nexus, violated patents. But the panel rejected
claims pertaining to Samsung's Galaxy S II (Review), Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch
and Galaxy S II Skyrocket.
Patent 5,579,239
Official description: Remote video transmission system.
What
it really means: Samsung's patent describes a system for digitizing,
compressing and transmitting audio and visual signals and then reversing
the process for broadcast.
The jury's verdict: Apple did not
infringe on a section of Samsung's patent that covers transmitting video
in real time over a cellular frequency.
Patent 6,226,449
Official description: Apparatus for recording and reproducing digital image and speech.
What
it really means: This Samsung patent refers to the kind of dual digital
camera that's become standard in many smartphones. As described in the
patent, the user is able to change the direction of the camera.
The jury's decision: Apple infringed on Samsung's patent on several versions of the iPhone and iPod Touch.