A
year ago, the marketing departments of nearly all flagship Android smartphone brands were busy touting
multi-core processors, gigabytes of RAM and constantly rising megapixel
counts. In the race to get the best specification-sheet, prices for
flagships were easily crossing the Rs. 40,000 - and even Rs. 50,000 -
mark as witnessed in full-page newspaper advertisements and hoardings.
This year, the game is changing. The battle for the best specifications
has turned into an all-out price war while brands try and find the next
'killer' feature, at, relatively speaking, a bargain bottom price.
Indian
smartphone brands such as Micromax and Karbonn were among the first to realise
that competing on price is the key to success in the country. Nearly
two-thirds of the smartphone market is in the sub-$150 (Rs. 9,000)
segment according to IDC.
International brands hopped on to this bandwagon, and Nokia's most successful Windows Phone device - the Lumia 520 - launched at just over
Rs. 10,000.
In the last 12 months though, Motorola led the field with its
affordable Moto E and
Moto G smartphones,
followed by Asus with the ZenFone 4 and ZenFone 5 - which lowered the price
further - and now "China's Apple" Xiaomi has stepped in the fray with the
Mi 3 smartphone, which has
specs that compare with flagships from Samsung, Sony, and HTC, but it is
available at nearly one-third the price.
Karan Thakkar, Senior
Market Analyst - Tablets, Enterprise Client Devices and PC Monitors at
IDC, told NDTV Gadgets over email that Indian smartphone brands have
forced global players to reconsider their pricing.
"We have
already witnessed Indian vendors continuously posting a price challenge
in front of the global players," says Thakkar. "Even global vendors are
positioning high quality products at competitive price. The Moto series
is a perfect example. Within five months shipments of Moto G, E and X
put together have crossed 1 million mark."
What makes this even
more interesting is that Motorola's phones are only available through a
single sales channel in India - online retailer Flipkart.

(Also see: Why Are Mobile
Brands Ditching Retail for Online Sales?)
The new phones from Asus have also already sold 40,000 units, four days
after the devices went on sale, and interest in the Xiaomi Mi 3 is also
sky-high.
According to an IDC report from June, the Indian
smartphone market grew 186 percent year-on-year in Q1 2014. It states,
"The sub-$200 [approximately Rs. 12,000] category in smartphones
contributed to about 78 percent [of the total increase], hinting at the
fact that the growth in the Indian smartphone market still remains
constrained towards the low-end of the spectrum."
What's changing
though is that the specifications of phones launching at lower prices
are at par with, if not ahead of, the flagships that cost thrice as
much.
Thakkar says high-quality smartphones are now available at competitive prices and that the big brands need to watch out.
"It
will be interesting to see how the market behaves to the Asus ZenFone
series and Xiaomi as both the brands are known for quality products with
competitive price," he says. "Big brands still hold the relevance as
the image they have built over time is not expected to fade away in
weeks or months. But having said that, they definitely need to keep a
check on the price for their future line-up of devices."
Another
change that has come about lately is a growing focus on Google's part to ensure that software updates
for phones will continue for longer periods of time. Google has frowned
upon manufacturers who pre-load their phones with customised software
and demanded that they stick to stock Android as much as possible, if
recent
reports
are to be believed.
One step in this direction is the Android One programme, where Google
provides a hardware reference design to manufacturers so that they make
high-quality devices running stock Android in the sub-$100 (Rs. 6,000)
price point. Micromax, Karbonn and Spice were the first three partners
in this programme that was unveiled at Google I/O in June and Intex and Celkon have signed up since then,
according to a
report.

(Also see: No, Google Will Not Subsidise Android One Handsets in India)
With
an entry-level ecosystem that promises a minimum level of performance,
the 'mid-range' phones under Rs. 20,000 have also had to improve the
user experience, which has reduced that gap to brand flagships. This
should help India's feature phone-dominated market move to smartphones
faster.
Anshul Gupta, Principal Research Analyst at Gartner, says, "Currently, the smartphone
market share in India is around 25-27 percent, but in four years it is
expected to reach 80 percent."
MediaTek, a chipset manufacturer
whose products power several smartphones made by Indian brands, says
India is a cost-conscious market and hence demand for entry-mid level
devices here would continue to rise.
Dr. Finbarr Moynihan, General
Manager - Corporate Sales International, MediaTek Inc, told NDTV Gadgets via email
that the demand for entry-level smartphones is not restricted to India.
"We certainly see that the entry level smartphones market is going to
drive a lot of unit growth in smartphone market," says Moynihan, adding,
"not only in emerging markets like India, Nepal, China but also there
is a need for those kind of products in markets like Europe and the US.
Not everybody wants a $700 phone. So, we see there is a kind of global
demand."
For big brands, differentiation in front of the customers
is now getting critical. Even though the prices of flagships tumble
quickly on online sales platforms, most of these phones are still much
more expensive than the newer entrants. One way to do this is by
establishing a secondary device ecosystem. Samsung and Sony have attempted to do this with a host of
accessories such as wearable fitness trackers and smartwatches.
That's
not enough, and so the big brands are also being more cost conscious.
Even Apple, a brand that never competes
on price, has offered buyback schemes and even introduced an 8GB variant
of the iPhone 5c in a
bid to boost sales in India. Apple also kept the iPhone 4 in India (and other
markets) at a discounted price after the variant was discontinued in the
US.

Those who followed the PC
industry in its heyday would remember the hype around processing power
brought up with each new iteration of processors and graphic cards.
Today though, when you look at ads for new laptops and PCs, their
specifications are mentioned like the "subject to terms and conditions"
line in insurance ads. What's playing out in the smartphone industry
today is not too dissimilar. The competition is on price and new
technology in the market appears to be geared towards optimisation.
Top-end smartphones no longer appear as appealing as the gulf in
performance has narrowed significantly this year, especially since not
all customers can differentiate between marketing buzz and 'real'
performance enhancements.
(Also see: Octa-core processors: Real
advantage or marketing
myth?)
IDC's
Thakkar says, "Flagship phones from few vendors are priced above Rs.
50,000. Needless to say, these phones have best in class components. And
it also caters to the 'premium' and 'niche' image that a brand would
like to showcase. Some of the innovations in such premium phones have
become less relevant to end users in the recent past."
However, Thakkar feels that companies need a reality check in terms of flagship prices.
"There
is a clear message to the manufacturers that if they don't decide the
right price, the market will," he says. "For instance, the official
price for Samsung Galaxy S5 is still Rs. 51,500 but the product is
available under Rs. 35,000 online."