EU-US Data Pact Scrapped by Top Court Following Facebook Complaint by Activist Max Schrems

Top EU court said that the standard contractual clauses arrangement could still stand, offering an alternative framework for stranded companies.

By Agence France-Presse | Updated: 16 July 2020 17:28 IST

EU-US Data Pact Scrapped by Top Court Following Facebook Complaint by Activist Max Schrems

Highlights

The decision stemmed from a complaint by Austrian activist Max Schrems
The previous decision struck down a deal called "Safe Harbour"
CCIA, the lobby for US big tech, criticised the decision

A crucial data arrangement between Europe and the US was invalidated on Thursday, throwing trans-Atlantic big tech into legal limbo.

The decision stemmed from a legal complaint by Austrian activist Max Schrems, who in 2015 scuppered a previous EU-US deal on which tech giants depend to do business.

"It seems we scored a 100 percent win," Schrems said on Twitter.

"For our privacy, the US will have to engage in serious surveillance reform to get back to a 'privileged' status for US companies," he said.

Schrems' legal assault began after the revelations by Edward Snowden of mass digital spying by US agencies, which the EU court at the time said were incompatible with European norms on privacy.

The previous decision struck down a deal called "Safe Harbour" that allowed for data transfers between Europe and US servers, throwing transatlantic business into legal limbo.

Its replacement "Privacy Shield", which is currently used by over 5,000 US companies, has now been invalidated as well.

The judges said that even though the deal requires that the US must comply with EU privacy law, the deal's provisions "do not grant Europeans actionable rights before the courts against the US authorities."

The court said, however, that another arrangement, known as standard contractual clauses, could stand, giving companies an alternative framework.

The case decided on Thursday originally focused on these complex clauses, an EU invention in which companies outside Europe commit to meeting EU laws on data and privacy.

These arrangements are however far more legally cumbersome for companies than a bilateral deal such as "Privacy Shield".

During the hearings, judges turned their focus to "Privacy Shield" and a legal advisor to the court warned that it may be illegal.

Schrems' latest case began in Ireland, the hub for Facebook's activities in the European Union. The Irish Data Protection Commission referred the complaint to Ireland's top court, which turned it over to the judges in Luxembourg.

CCIA, the lobby for US big tech, criticised the decision, "which creates legal uncertainty for the thousands of large and small companies on both sides of the Atlantic."

"We trust that EU and US decision-makers will swiftly develop a sustainable solution, in line with EU law, to ensure the continuation of data flows which underpins the transatlantic economy," CCIA added.

Why are smartphone prices rising in India? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or RSS, download the episode, or just hit the play button below.

Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details.

Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.