Oppo F21 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact comparison

Show Only Differences Highlight Differences	Oppo F21 Pro	Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
key specs
Display	6.43-inch	5.20-inch
Processor	Qualcomm Snapdragon 680	-
Front Camera	32-megapixel	8-megapixel
Rear Camera	64-megapixel + 2-megapixel + 2-megapixel	22.6-megapixel
RAM	8GB	4GB
Storage	128GB	64GB
Battery Capacity	4500mAh	2500mAh
OS	Android 12	Android 8.1 Oreo
Resolution	1080x2400 pixels	1080x2280 pixels
general
Brand	Oppo	Sharp
Model	F21 Pro	Aquos R2 Compact
Release date	April 12, 2022	November 1, 2018
Launched in India	Yes	No
Form factor	Touchscreen	Touchscreen
Dimensions (mm)	159.90 x 73.20 x 7.49	131.00 x 64.00 x 9.30
Weight (g)	175.00	135.00
Battery capacity (mAh)	4500	2500
Colours	Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange	Green, Black, White
display
Refresh Rate	90 Hz	-
Resolution Standard	FHD	-
Screen size (inches)	6.43	5.20
Resolution	1080x2400 pixels	1080x2280 pixels
Protection type	Gorilla Glass	Gorilla Glass
Aspect ratio	20:9	19:9
Pixels per inch (PPI)	409	-
hardware
Processor	octa-core	-
Processor make	Qualcomm Snapdragon 680	Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
RAM	8GB	4GB
Internal storage	128GB	64GB
Expandable storage	-	Yes
Expandable storage type	-	microSD
Expandable storage up to (GB)	-	512
camera
Rear camera	64-megapixel (f/1.7) + 2-megapixel (f/3.3) + 2-megapixel (f/2.4)	22.6-megapixel (f/1.9)
No. of Rear Cameras	3	-
Rear autofocus	Yes	Yes
Rear flash	Yes	Yes
Front camera	32-megapixel (f/2.4)	8-megapixel (f/2.2)
No. of Front Cameras	1	-
software
Operating system	Android 12	Android 8.1 Oreo
Skin	ColorOS 12.1	-
connectivity
Wi-Fi	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standards supported	802.11 a/b/g/n/ac	802.11 a/b/g/n
GPS	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes, v 5.10	Yes, v 5.00
USB Type-C	Yes	Yes
Headphones	3.5mm	-
Number of SIMs	2	-
sim 1
SIM Type	Nano-SIM	-
GSM/CDMA	GSM	-
3G	Yes	-
4G/ LTE	Yes	-
sim 2
SIM Type	Nano-SIM	-
GSM/CDMA	GSM	-
3G	Yes	-
4G/ LTE	Yes	-
sensors
In-Display Fingerprint Sensor	Yes	-
Compass/ Magnetometer	Yes	-
Proximity sensor	Yes	-
Accelerometer	Yes	-
Ambient light sensor	Yes	-
Gyroscope	Yes	-

Related Comparisons

Popular Mobile Brands