Telegram Directed by Court to Provide Details of Channels Violating Copyright Law Under Sealed Cover: Details

The Delhi High Court observed that an entity could not use the defence of the right to privacy and free speech to escape consequences of legal actions.

Written by David Delima | Updated: 31 August 2022 16:49 IST

Photo Credit: Unsplash/Eyestetix Studio

Telegram submitted it was not obliged to disclose details of users as an intermediary under the IT Act

Highlights

Telegram submitted it was not obliged to provide details under the IT Act
The case in the Delhi High Court pertains to illegal sharing of content
Telegram will have to submit the channel operators' details in two weeks

Telegram has been directed by the Delhi High court to disclose details of channels on the messaging app that were involved in sharing content in violation of copyright law, in a sealed cover within two weeks, according to a report. The High Court reportedly directed the messaging service to provide details of the channel operators, including their mobile numbers and IP addresses, while observing that an entity could not use the defence of the right to privacy and right to free speech to escape consequences of legal actions.

Observing that the plaintiffs would be rendered remediless to recover damages for the "illegal" sharing of teaching materials on Telegram under "masked" identities if the channel operators' identites were not disclosed, the Delhi High Court directed Telegram to provide details of the operators, according to a report by PTI.

As per the report, Justice Prathiba M Singh also noted that the messaging platform's reliance on the right to freedom of speech and right to privacy was “completely inapposite" in the facts and circumstances of the case, as per the report.

Samsung Wins Patent for a Tri-Fold Smartphone With Specialised Barrier Layer for Improved Durability

While Telegram had submitted that it was not obliged to disclose the details of users as it was an intermediary under the IT Act, the court observed that the provisions of the Act did not obviate Telegram's duty to take all effective steps to protect intellectual property rights.

The court also stated that disabling or taking down content was not enough to tackle the channels, due to the "mushrooming" of these channels on the messaging service, which has servers located in Singapore.

This week, we discuss Android 13 on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Spotify, Gaana, JioSaavn, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.

Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details.

Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.

Further reading: Telegram, Copyright Act, Privacy, Copyright, IT Act

David Delima

Email David Delima

As a writer on technology with Gadgets 360, David Delima is interested in open-source technology, cybersecurity, consumer privacy, and loves to read and write about how the Internet works. David can be contacted via email at DavidD@ndtv.com, on Twitter at @DxDavey, and Mastodon at mstdn.social/@delima. More