Apple’s Request to Delay App Store Changes in Fortnite-Epic Case Denied by US Judge

Epic went to trial earlier this year over Apple's practice of forcing developers to use its in-app payment system.

By Reuters | Updated: 10 November 2021 13:17 IST

Apple believes no additional business changes should be required to take effect

Highlights

Apple immediately said it would appeal the denial
Apple's own in-app payment methods would still be more convenient
Apple has appealed the judge's ruling, asking her to pause her orders

A US judge on Tuesday denied Apple's efforts to pause orders handed down after an antitrust case brought by Fortnite creator Epic Games.

The iPhone maker immediately said it would appeal the denial, aiming to stave off potentially significant changes to its lucrative App Store before a December 9 deadline to implement the court's orders.

Epic went to trial earlier this year over Apple's practice of forcing developers to use its in-app payment system and to pay commissions to the iPhone maker. In September, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a ruling that was mostly favorable to Apple.

Samsung Wins Patent for a Tri-Fold Smartphone With Specialised Barrier Layer for Improved Durability

But she expressed concern that Apple was keeping consumers in the dark about alternative payment methods and ordered Apple to lift its ban on in-app links, buttons and messages to users about other ways to pay.

Apple has appealed the judge's ruling, asking her to pause her orders while the appeals process plays out, which could take several years.

In a sharp rebuke to the iPhone maker, Gonzalez Rogers said that Apple's prohibitions on telling consumers about other payment methods showed "incipient antitrust conduct including supercompetitive commission rates resulting in extraordinarily high operating margins" for its App Store.

iPhone 13 Third-Party Screen Replacement Disables Face ID: iFixit

She wrote that Apple's own in-app payment methods would still be more convenient than third-party methods and that many consumers might still choose to use it.

"The fact remains: it should be their choice," Gonzalez Rogers wrote. "Consumer information, transparency, and consumer choice is in the interest of the public."

Apple said it will appeal Gonzalez Rogers' denial to the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which could grant Apple a temporary stay before the December 9 deadline.

iPhone X With USB-C Port Is Now Up for Auction on eBay

"Apple believes no additional business changes should be required to take effect until all appeals in this case are resolved. We intend to ask the Ninth Circuit for a stay based on these circumstances," Apple said in a statement.

© Thomson Reuters 2021

What's most interesting about Apple's new MacBook Pros, M1 Pro and M1 Max silicon, AirPods (3rd Generation), and Apple Music Voice plan? We discuss this on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Spotify, Gaana, JioSaavn, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.

Affiliate links may be automatically generated - see our ethics statement for details.

Comments

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who'sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.